Sri Lanka decision proposal
Tell us what to change or add.
Archived decisions
Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.
Use Change example to try different values. Use Data needed to check the fields and sources. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.
Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.
Compare cultivated, uncultivated and unknown hectares in the member-land frame.
Validation required
Fictional default example · 2025.
What the selected record shows. 65 of 100 ha are cultivated; 30 are known not cultivated; 5 have unknown cultivation status.
Next step. Check the records behind the uncovered and unknown groups. Prepare coverage follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Uncultivated land is not automatically available or suitable for cultivation.
100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.
Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures. Cultivation status does not establish tenure, irrigation reliability or suitability for expansion.
Other required records: Member plots; usable hectares; cultivated hectares; season; inactivity reason.
Calculation appendix
Check potentially overlapping support to the same permitted member and purpose.
What the selected record shows. Overlapping days: 61 days. Review possible overlap.
Next step. Review possible overlap. Prepare overlap review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Overlapping dates do not prove duplicate entitlement.
Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.
Other required records: Member ID; programme; purpose; support quantity; period; entitlement.
Prepare a crop-stage water-needs scenario for the stated member area.
Verified published component · Crop evapotranspiration ETc component
What the selected record shows. Gross daily irrigation requirement: 6,687.5 m³/day.
Next step. Review weather, crop, water-availability and operating evidence. Prepare water-needs scenario in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Calculated demand does not establish water availability or authorise a release.
ETc = ETo × Kc. Net = max(0, ETc + percolation + desired storage increase − rainfall after runoff − capillary contribution). Gross = net × hectares ×10 / application efficiency.
The full local balance, rooting depth, stress, crop stage and operating constraints still matter. The paddy allowance is explicit and must be zero where inapplicable. This is not an authorized reservoir release.
Other required records: Crop areas; growth stages; rainfall; soil water; percolation; efficiency.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 Crop EvapotranspirationInstitution publication · Chapter 5, Crop coefficient approach, equation 56
This verifies the ETc component only. Local water-balance allowances, coefficients and operating decisions still need confirmation.
Identify collective farming requests past their response date.
What the selected record shows. Open days past due: 29 days. Follow up overdue case.
Next step. Follow up overdue case; confirm the missing condition evidence. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Age alone does not establish eligibility or need.
Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.
Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.
Other required records: Request; institution; receipt; due date; response; responsible coordinator.
Check proposed water-rotation dates, effort and dependencies.
What the selected record shows. Planned duration: 3 days. Resolve overlapping resource bookings.
Next step. Resolve overlapping resource bookings. Prepare schedule review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A schedule does not establish hydraulic feasibility, agreement or release authority.
Check start/end order, operating window, effort, predecessor completion and overlapping bookings for the same resource. A conflict is flagged; no optimal schedule is invented.
Other required records: Approved allocation; outlet capacity; crop stage; delivery windows; member agreement.
Compare documented water delivery with the same agreed allocation and period.
What the selected record shows. Difference: -10 m³.
Next step. Check the matching records and reasons for the difference. Prepare difference review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A difference does not establish unfairness or its cause.
Observed value minus Planned value. Relative change = 100 × difference / Planned value when the earlier value is positive.
Other required records: Outlet; location; agreed water; actual delivery; hectares; season.
Check usable input stocks, commitments and matching expected receipts.
What the selected record shows. Uncommitted usable stock: 310 kg input. Review replenishment gap.
Next step. Review replenishment gap. Prepare stock review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Quantity alone does not establish quality, delivery certainty or a purchase authority.
Usable = physical−quarantined−expired (non-overlapping groups). Available = usable−commitments. Additional gap = max(0, new demand−available).
Stock must be compatible by item, lot, condition, expiry and delivery window. Do not allocate quarantined/expired stock or silently erase overcommitment.
Other required records: Input specification; demand; current stock; supplier lead time; commitments; expiry.
Compare aggregated produce with buyer specifications, quantities and windows.
What the selected record shows. Supply minus demand: -300 kg. Review quantity/capacity gap.
Next step. Review quantity/capacity gap. Prepare matching review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A quantity match does not establish conformity or a sales contract.
Compare the same specification and unit, uncommitted quantity and overlapping delivery windows. Keep mandatory quality and use conditions explicit.
A candidate match does not reserve stock, appoint a person, authorize waste reuse or form a contract.
Other required records: Member supply; product; grade; quantity; harvest window; buyer demand.
Check machinery bookings against resources, effort and predecessor tasks.
The example does not reserve a machine or appoint an operator.
Other required records: Equipment; condition; member bookings; field access; operation duration; crop window.
Identify common tank and canal repair cases past their response date.
Age alone does not establish engineering urgency or the best repair.
Other required records: Asset condition; defects; command area; users affected; work options; costs.
Reconcile organisation receipts, expenditure and the matching closing balance.
What the selected record shows. Calculated closing funds are 164,000 LKR. The recorded closing observation is 163,500 LKR; recorded minus calculated is -500 LKR. Check the component records before explaining that difference.
Next step. Reconcile closing balance. Prepare balance review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A difference does not establish fraud, a legal debt or final accounts acceptance.
Opening + receipts/additions − payments/reductions − other documented adjustments. Compare with independently recorded closing. A negative cash scenario is a shortfall, not an invalid water volume.
Use the same physical boundary, period and units. A residual is a reconciliation issue, not automatically a measured loss.
Other required records: Opening balance; member contributions; sales; authorized spending; bank statements.
Compare inconsistent member descriptions and original source references.
What the selected record shows. The original record says “Member identifier: primary register entry”; the comparison says “Member identifier: conflicting source return”. Their matching meaning has not been established. Obtain the source definitions and supporting records before reconciling them.
Next step. Resolve source disagreement. Prepare source comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A matching name does not establish the same member or justify merging private records.
Compare original definitions, identifiers, units and versions against documented equivalence evidence. Preserve conflicts and unresolved mappings; do not subtract category labels or silently merge records.
Other required records: Member identifier; membership evidence; active status; plot linkage; consent.
Find missing meeting, audit and disclosure evidence.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this governance case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Next step. Obtain the missing evidence listed below. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Checklist completeness does not establish legal or organisational compliance.
Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.
Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.
Other required records: Rules; meeting records; election evidence; audit findings; approved obligations.
Find members with a documented skills gap but no confirmed matching training.
What the selected record shows. 30 members are known to be uncovered; 5 have unknown coverage. 65% are confirmed covered.
Attendance does not establish competence or a training effect.
Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.
Other required records: Member needs; prior training; practice adoption; crop; participation.
Compare collective crop-calendar and rotation choices under a water shortage.
What the selected record shows. There is not enough information to choose this option. Obtain the records and evidence about conditions listed below. The supplied budget less cost is 300,000 LKR.
Next step. Obtain the missing records before choosing. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Cost alone does not establish crop suitability, water availability or agreement.
Compare each alternative's stated benefit, adverse effects, domain evidence and mandatory constraints. Where cost and budget are supplied, budget balance = budget − option cost. A budget balance alone does not determine domain feasibility or select an option.
Other required records: Approved forecasts; available water; crop choices; loss estimates; member consultation.
Find missing evidence for shared crop-damage reports.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this crop-loss evidence case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
The example does not diagnose damage or determine compensation.
Other required records: Event; member plot; damaged hectares; crop stage; inspection; claim reference.
Compare collective storage and handling cash flows.
Verified published formula · Discounted cash-flow NPV
What the selected record shows. At the supplied 8% annual discount assumption, the five-year cash flows and residual value give 109,847.353 LKR net present value after the initial investment. The figure compares cash flows under these assumptions.
Next step. Review the cash flows, discount assumptions and constraints. Prepare cash-flow comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Net present value does not establish reduced losses, quality or investment authority.
NPV = −initial investment + sum of year1…5 net cash flows discounted at the stated annual rate, including residual value once in year5.
Match currency, price year, real/nominal basis and cash-flow timing. The example rate and five-year horizon are assumptions, not institutional financing terms; no credit approval follows.
Other required records: Supply volume; losses; storage capacity; cost; market timing; finance.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Guidelines for defining financial economic environmental and social informationInstitution publication · Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, discounting and Net Present Value
The five-year horizon, discount rate and cash assumptions are local settings. Verification does not approve an investment or loan.
Follow up unresolved member objections and participation barriers.
What the selected record shows. 16 unresolved issue(s). 71.579% responded; response is not consent. Review the issue references and participation barriers.
Response rates do not establish consent to a collective plan.
100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.
Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.
Other required records: Plan version; members; consultation responses; water rights; unresolved issues.
Find members without confirmed receipt of agreed information updates.
Recorded delivery does not establish understanding or agreement.
Other required records: Member frame; preferred channel; message; delivery evidence; consent; date.
Compare recorded outcomes of group services across the supplied periods and groups.
Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic
What the selected record shows. Treatment change: 170,000; comparison change: 70,000; difference in changes: 100,000 LKR/ha. This comparison alone does not establish causation or benefit.
A difference in changes does not establish a causal group-service effect.
(Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.
The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.
Other required records: Member baseline; service uptake; margins; follow-up; comparison; market conditions.
World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second EditionInstitution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170
The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.
Source. Sri Lanka publication.
Data needed. Organization registration, year, general meeting date, notice and signed minutes.
Method. Check the annual general meeting requirement under the Agrarian Development Act and retain the meeting evidence by year.
Worked example. A farmer organization’s file has a meeting notice but no signed minutes for the year. Ask for the record that confirms the annual general meeting was held.
Next step. Request missing minutes or refer a missed meeting to the Agrarian Development Council under the applicable procedure.
Government of Sri Lanka, Agrarian Development Act No. 46 of 2000. §43(9), annual general meeting and council power after the stated period.
Confirm applicable amendments and how the council handles missed meetings.
Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.
Existing form reference: b5701ed646f0f063
Existing form reference: cc316b77dd9398f9
Existing form reference: a64b0a6754afd4ed
Existing form reference: 592c3b578787edcd
Existing form reference: 648a6f28a711dfa9
Existing form reference: e877698582fc591c
Existing form reference: 54fb1fe96af4f04c
Existing form reference: fc991a6c3bc249f6
Existing form reference: 57c890c642eab82c
Existing form reference: 0bb5ed17e5cdc863
Existing form reference: f2c8e1b979a467f1
Existing form reference: 5ef25f806a9c3864
Existing form reference: 65fb55fc4bacaeb4
Existing form reference: 3d27791c0b26d5a7
Existing form reference: 362fe913ea87b4d5
Existing form reference: 4c6b93b0f4ec772d
Existing form reference: edf7d040b8bcbc45
Existing form reference: f462aa65988abf9a
Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.
Open this screen for Farmer OrganizationsSee the presentation example
Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.
Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.
An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.
User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.
These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.
We currently use public data and published reports where available. Please confirm whether your institution can provide data directly, so we can avoid retyping or reading figures from PDFs.
Do not enter passwords, access keys or private account details.
Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.