Tell us what to change or add.
Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.
Use Change example to try different values. Use Data needed to check the fields and sources. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.
Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.
Check progression from enterprise-support offers to documented uptake.
Validation required
Fictional default example · 2025.
What the selected record shows. Verified completion share: 53.333 %.
Next step. Check the original cases that have not reached a verified outcome. Prepare progress follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Completion shares do not establish whether the support was appropriate or effective.
100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.
Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people. The original cohort and nested review/completion stages must match; an uncompleted record is not automatically overdue. Unknown follow-up is a subset, not an extra stage.
Other required records: Eligible enterprises; offers; accepted offers; participation; reasons for non-uptake.
Calculation appendix
Check trainee follow-up through the stated business-assistance stages.
Attendance or a completed follow-up does not establish business improvement.
Other required records: Training cohort; completion; business plans; support referral; business establishment.
Identify enterprise-assistance cases past their recorded response date.
What the selected record shows. Open days past due: 29 days. Follow up overdue case.
Next step. Follow up overdue case; confirm the missing condition evidence. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Age alone does not establish need, eligibility or a support priority.
Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.
Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.
Other required records: Case ID; support type; receipt; due date; pauses; assigned adviser.
Find target enterprises without confirmed outreach coverage.
What the selected record shows. 30 enterprises are known to be uncovered; 5 have unknown coverage. 65% are confirmed covered.
Next step. Check the records behind the uncovered and unknown groups. Prepare coverage follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Outreach does not establish uptake or enterprise benefit.
100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.
Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.
Other required records: Enterprise frame; eligible need; support received; district; programme period.
Review enterprise cash-flow scenarios before financial and market appraisal.
Verified published formula · Discounted cash-flow NPV
What the selected record shows. At the supplied 8% annual discount assumption, the five-year cash flows and residual value give 109,847.353 LKR net present value after the initial investment. The figure compares cash flows under these assumptions.
Next step. Review the cash flows, discount assumptions and constraints. Prepare cash-flow comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Net present value alone does not establish viability or approve finance.
NPV = −initial investment + sum of year1…5 net cash flows discounted at the stated annual rate, including residual value once in year5.
Match currency, price year, real/nominal basis and cash-flow timing. The example rate and five-year horizon are assumptions, not institutional financing terms; no credit approval follows.
Other required records: Sales assumptions; variable costs; fixed costs; cash flows; markets; risks.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Guidelines for defining financial economic environmental and social informationInstitution publication · Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, discounting and Net Present Value
The five-year horizon, discount rate and cash assumptions are local settings. Verification does not approve an investment or loan.
Find missing evidence for a finance-support pathway referral.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this finance referral case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Next step. Obtain the missing evidence listed below. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
The example does not approve a loan, grant or programme entitlement.
Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.
Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.
Other required records: Enterprise needs; finance product terms; eligibility evidence; repayment capacity; consent.
Compare proposed mentor time with documented enterprise needs and availability.
What the selected record shows. Available minus required hours: 8 hours. Resolve specification, window or conditions.
Available hours do not establish expertise, compatibility or an appointment.
Match documented expertise, available effort, date windows and required conflict/clearance evidence. A match suggests a candidate; it appoints nobody.
A candidate match does not reserve stock, appoint a person, authorize waste reuse or form a contract.
Other required records: Enterprise need; mentor expertise; availability; conflicts; location; due date.
Compare enterprise offers with documented buyer specifications and demand.
What the selected record shows. Supply minus demand: -300 kg. Review quantity/capacity gap.
Next step. Review quantity/capacity gap. Prepare matching review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A quantity match does not establish quality, an order or buyer commitment.
Compare the same specification and unit, uncommitted quantity and overlapping delivery windows. Keep mandatory quality and use conditions explicit.
Other required records: Product; grade; capacity; delivery window; buyer demand; quality requirements.
Separate confirmed business continuation, closure and unknown follow-up.
What the selected record shows. Confirmed continuation lower bound: 78 %.
Next step. Check unknown follow-up separately from confirmed survival and failure. Prepare cohort follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Unknown enterprises must not be counted as closed or continuing.
Lower =100 × known survivors / original cohort. Upper =100 × (known survivors + unknown) / original cohort. Survivors + known failures + unknown = original cohort; replacements do not enter it.
These bounds account for unknown status; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Use actual follow-up dates and distinguish cohort membership from repeated visits.
Other required records: Enterprise cohort; start date; operating status; follow-up; nonresponse; closure reasons.
Compare enterprise outcomes across the supplied support and comparison records.
Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic
What the selected record shows. Treatment change: 170,000; comparison change: 70,000; difference in changes: 100,000 LKR. This comparison alone does not establish causation or benefit.
Differences do not establish that assistance caused the outcome.
(Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.
The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence.
Other required records: Baseline sales; follow-up sales; employment; costs; comparison firms; external factors.
World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second EditionInstitution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170
The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.
Find target enterprises without confirmed access to an opportunity.
Recorded access does not establish fair participation or benefit.
Other required records: Eligible enterprise frame; consented group attributes; offers; participation; outcomes.
Find missing source records before an enterprise-grant referral.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this grant administration case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
The example does not award a grant or establish final eligibility.
Other required records: Scheme version; applicant evidence; budget; eligibility; prior support; approvals.
Check whether assistance records overlap for the same purpose, recipient and period.
What the selected record shows. Overlapping days: 61 days. Review possible overlap.
Next step. Review possible overlap. Prepare overlap review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Overlapping dates do not prove duplicate or improper support.
Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.
Other required records: Enterprise ID; programme; support purpose; amount; period; entitlement evidence.
Compare training approaches against the stated capability gaps.
What the selected record shows. There is not enough information to choose this option. Obtain the records and evidence about conditions listed below. The supplied budget less cost is 300,000 LKR.
Next step. Obtain the missing records before choosing. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Cost and attendance do not establish competence or the best training topic.
Compare each alternative's stated benefit, adverse effects, domain evidence and mandatory constraints. Where cost and budget are supplied, budget balance = budget − option cost. A budget balance alone does not determine domain feasibility or select an option.
Other required records: Needs assessments; skills; course availability; prior training; adoption evidence.
Find missing registration and compliance records before a responsible referral.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this formalization support case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
The prototype does not register a business or determine compliance.
Other required records: Enterprise stage; required registrations; existing documents; gaps; responsible agency.
Compare enterprise-continuity choices using exposure and operating constraints.
A stated benefit does not establish avoided losses or business resilience.
Other required records: Hazard exposure; business dependencies; adaptation costs; continuity benefits; constraints.
Compare incubation demand with usable facility and adviser capacity.
What the selected record shows. Usable capacity minus demand: -15 adviser hours. Review capacity shortfall.
Next step. Review capacity shortfall. Prepare capacity review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Capacity alone does not establish suitability or allocate a place.
Usable capacity = rated capacity − documented unavailable capacity. Surplus/shortfall = usable − matching demand.
Match peak/average basis, time window, skill, staffing, accessibility and other binding constraints. One aggregate capacity does not override a safety constraint.
Other required records: Applications; needs; workspace capacity; advisers; time requirements; approved criteria.
Reconcile enterprise-support needs with confirmed financing.
What the selected record shows. Unfunded need: 850,000 LKR. Review unfunded need.
Next step. Review unfunded need. Prepare funding review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A funding gap does not establish entitlement or authority to commit funds.
Unfunded = need − commitments. Undisbursed = commitments − disbursements. Unspent = disbursements − eligible spending.
Keep commitments, cash receipts, expenditure and verified physical outputs separate. Negative balances flag overcommitment or reconciliation; no automatic accounting adjustment.
Other required records: Budget; approved assistance; commitments; disbursements; eligible expenditure; currency.
Compare enterprise identity definitions and original source references.
What the selected record shows. The original record says “Registration ID: primary register entry”; the comparison says “Registration ID: conflicting source return”. Their matching meaning has not been established. Obtain the source definitions and supporting records before reconciling them.
Next step. Resolve source disagreement. Prepare source comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A matching name does not establish the same legal enterprise.
Compare original definitions, identifiers, units and versions against documented equivalence evidence. Preserve conflicts and unresolved mappings; do not subtract category labels or silently merge records.
Other required records: Registration ID; source names; location; owner consent; duplicates; verification.
Compare continuation and redesign choices using outcome and exclusion evidence.
Budget alone does not establish which support approach should continue.
Other required records: Verified outcomes; costs; inclusion; unintended effects; context; evaluation evidence.
Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.
Existing form reference: b3d77003d1866be4
Existing form reference: d897e621e1f5fb87
Existing form reference: 3f2a54c6faac12f2
Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.
Open this screen for National Enterprise Development AuthoritySee the presentation example
Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.
Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.
An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.
User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.
These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.
We currently use public data and published reports where available. Please confirm whether your institution can provide data directly, so we can avoid retyping or reading figures from PDFs.
Do not enter passwords, access keys or private account details.
Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.