Tell us what to change or add.
Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.
Use Change example to try different values. Use Data needed to check the fields and sources. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.
Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.
Identify field assignments whose evidence or response is overdue.
Validation required
Fictional default example · 2025.
What the selected record shows. Open days past due: 29 days. Follow up overdue case.
Next step. Follow up overdue case; confirm the missing condition evidence. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A task record does not establish accepted completion.
Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.
Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.
Other required records: Assignment ID; expected observation; submitted record; review status; due date.
Calculation appendix
Identify required monitoring visits not confirmed complete or still unknown.
What the selected record shows. 30 visits are known to be uncovered; 5 have unknown coverage. 65% are confirmed covered.
Next step. Check the records behind the uncovered and unknown groups. Prepare coverage follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Visit coverage does not establish the quality of an observation.
100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.
Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.
Other required records: Site frame; required visits; completed accepted visits; access; staff; season.
Review overdue community cases alongside their documented urgency evidence.
Days overdue alone do not establish an urgency ranking.
Other required records: Case ID; received date; urgency evidence; due date; response; accountable institution.
Compare supplied location separation, positional accuracies and reference evidence.
What the selected record shows. Location separation: 32 m.
Next step. Reconcile the original records using their source references. Prepare source comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
The page does not calculate geometry or confirm a site from its name.
Display supplied location separation with the two reported accuracies and coordinate-reference evidence. Do not treat a matched name or boundary overlap as confirmed identity.
Other required records: Activity ID; submitted coordinates; site boundary; GPS accuracy; field confirmation.
Compare sub-watershed actions using community priorities, resources and safeguards.
What the selected record shows. There is not enough information to choose this option. Obtain the records and evidence about conditions listed below. The supplied budget less cost is 300,000 LKR.
Next step. Obtain the missing records before choosing. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A cost comparison does not establish community consent or a preferred action.
Compare each alternative's stated benefit, adverse effects, domain evidence and mandatory constraints. Where cost and budget are supplied, budget balance = budget − option cost. A budget balance alone does not determine domain feasibility or select an option.
Other required records: Sites; needs; costs; water links; safeguards; community preferences; constraints.
Check field-work timing, resource bookings and prerequisites.
What the selected record shows. Planned duration: 3 days. Resolve overlapping resource bookings.
Next step. Resolve overlapping resource bookings. Prepare schedule review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
The example schedule does not send assignments or authorise works.
Check start/end order, operating window, effort, predecessor completion and overlapping bookings for the same resource. A conflict is flagged; no optimal schedule is invented.
Other required records: Works; dependencies; rainfall windows; farming calendar; labour; approvals.
Identify original restoration cohorts with failed or unknown follow-up.
What the selected record shows. Confirmed survival lower bound: 78 %.
Next step. Check unknown follow-up separately from confirmed survival and failure. Prepare cohort follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Unknown follow-up is not mortality; replacements remain separate.
Lower =100 × known survivors / original cohort. Upper =100 × (known survivors + unknown) / original cohort. Survivors + known failures + unknown = original cohort; replacements do not enter it.
These bounds account for unknown status; they are not statistical confidence intervals. Use actual follow-up dates and distinguish cohort membership from repeated visits.
Other required records: Planting cohort; counts; survival; replacements; last visit; follow-up date.
Check treatment measurements and inspection evidence before verification.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this conservation works case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Next step. Obtain the missing evidence listed below. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Recorded activity is not verified soil or water improvement.
Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.
Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.
Other required records: Work ID; design; measured dimensions; location; inspection; acceptance conditions.
Compare local water requirement and supply records before a referral.
What the selected record shows. Difference: -10 m³/day.
Next step. Check the matching records and reasons for the difference. Prepare difference review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A shortfall does not identify its cause or establish an authorised response.
Observed value minus Planned value. Relative change = 100 × difference / Planned value when the earlier value is positive.
Other required records: Location; demand; supply observation; affected households; dates; source verification.
Check stages between field demonstration and verified adoption.
What the selected record shows. Verified completion share: 53.333 %.
Next step. Check the original cases that have not reached a verified outcome. Prepare progress follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Participation is not evidence of adoption or benefit.
100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.
Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people. The original cohort and nested review/completion stages must match; an uncompleted record is not automatically overdue. Unknown follow-up is a subset, not an extra stage.
Other required records: Participant cohort; attendance; practice; adoption evidence; follow-up date.
Check hazard observations and the referral evidence for a competent authority.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this local hazards case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
The prototype does not issue a warning or determine hazard severity.
Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.
Other required records: Observation; location; time; photographs; exposed assets; escalation protocol.
Compare field demand with usable staff hours.
What the selected record shows. Usable capacity minus demand: -15 staff hours. Review capacity shortfall.
Next step. Review capacity shortfall. Prepare capacity review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A capacity gap does not appoint staff or establish travel feasibility.
Usable capacity = rated capacity − documented unavailable capacity. Surplus/shortfall = usable − matching demand.
Match peak/average basis, time window, skill, staffing, accessibility and other binding constraints. One aggregate capacity does not override a safety constraint.
Other required records: Task hours; travel time; staff skills; available hours; due dates.
Identify missing safeguard evidence before field-work review.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this safeguard conditions case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
A checklist does not grant clearance or authorise starting work.
Other required records: Site approval; consent; safeguards; unresolved conditions; evidence; responsible reviewer.
Compare usable field kits and commitments with the stated requirement.
What the selected record shows. Uncommitted usable stock: 3 field-instrument kits. Review replenishment gap.
Next step. Review replenishment gap. Prepare stock review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Availability must match the instrument, condition and visit window.
Usable = physical−quarantined−expired (non-overlapping groups). Available = usable−commitments. Additional gap = max(0, new demand−available).
Stock must be compatible by item, lot, condition, expiry and delivery window. Do not allocate quarantined/expired stock or silently erase overcommitment.
Other required records: Equipment ID; reservations; condition; usable stock; field schedule; lead time.
Identify unresolved objections to a sub-watershed plan.
What the selected record shows. 16 unresolved issue(s). 71.579% responded; response is not consent. Review the issue references and participation barriers.
Participation or response is not agreement with the plan.
100 × distinct respondents / invited people. Record unresolved issues individually; one respondent may raise several issues.
Response, attendance and silence are not consent. Participation does not transfer decision authority or settle rights.
Other required records: Plan version; affected groups; responses; objections; commitments; resolution.
Compare planned and recorded work packages within the same scope.
What the selected record shows. Difference: -4 work packages.
A difference does not establish cause or accepted completion.
A work package must have the same agreed scope; counts do not combine unequal work quantities.
Other required records: Task target; actual quantity; period; unit; delay reason; evidence.
Compare documented journeys for monitoring visits.
What the selected record shows. The supplied journey is 24 km and 65 minutes. Usable capacity is 18 against 15 required in the stated service units. Access and operating conditions: Unresolved.
No route is calculated and no safe-access determination is made.
Compare supplied route times/distances, usable capacity and documented access/window constraints. Display feasible candidates; no route optimization is implied.
Straight-line distance is not a road route. Example routes establish no current road status, emergency clearance or safe evacuation instruction. This decision view compares supplied journeys. It does not calculate a route or run a coordinate-based analysis.
Other required records: Site coordinates; roads; closures; travel time; visit duration; team capacity.
Review field-support records whose participant, purpose and dates overlap.
What the selected record shows. Overlapping days: 61 days. Review possible overlap.
Next step. Review possible overlap. Prepare overlap review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
An overlap does not establish duplicate entitlement.
Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.
Other required records: Participant ID; support purpose; programme; period; prior support; authorization.
Find missing field-record metadata and supporting references.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this field form quality case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
A complete record does not establish a reliable field observation.
Other required records: Record ID; required fields; units; timestamps; source; attachments; validation.
Compare outcomes in treated and comparison observations.
Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic
What the selected record shows. Treatment change: 17; comparison change: 7; difference in changes: 10 percentage points. This comparison alone does not establish causation or benefit.
The difference alone does not establish that the works caused an improvement.
(Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.
The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence. This named fictional indicator illustrates the calculation. Design evidence, adverse effects and attribution remain separate; a difference in changes does not establish causation.
Other required records: Baseline; follow-up; intervention dates; comparison sites; weather; community feedback.
World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second EditionInstitution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170
The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.
Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.
Existing form reference: f0192290b75919c0
Existing form reference: e6af681e07c8efdc
Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.
Open this screen for Sub-Watershed Integrated Delivery TeamsSee the presentation example
Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.
Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.
An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.
User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.
These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.
We currently use public data and published reports where available. Please confirm whether your institution can provide data directly, so we can avoid retyping or reading figures from PDFs.
Do not enter passwords, access keys or private account details.
Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.