Tell us what to change or add.
Open a decision below. Check the area, period, inputs, result and proposed next step.
Use Change example to try different values. Use Data needed to check the fields and sources. The land-use change decision has its own comparison views.
Record your corrections below, then download your answers or print them.
Identify project outputs whose checking or verified completion is outstanding.
Validation required
Fictional default example · 2025.
What the selected record shows. Verified completion share: 53.333 %.
Next step. Check the original cases that have not reached a verified outcome. Prepare progress follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Recorded completion stages do not establish formal acceptance.
100 × verified completed members / original unique cohort. Keep unknown follow-up separate; stages are nested, not independent populations.
Attendance, receipt, adoption, delivered service and outcomes are distinct stages. Repeated visits must not become new people. The original cohort and nested review/completion stages must match; an uncompleted record is not automatically overdue. Unknown follow-up is a subset, not an extra stage.
Other required records: Output ID; target; submitted quantity; accepted quantity; evidence; reviewer.
Calculation appendix
Review expenditure and verified physical progress against their separate plans.
What the selected record shows. Spending against phased budget: 66.667 %.
Next step. Check the matching records and reasons for the difference. Prepare difference review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
The percentages have different denominators; their difference is not a measure of misuse.
100 × spending/phased budget, and verified−planned physical progress. Do not subtract LKR from physical progress, infer earned value or equate expenditure with outcomes.
Other required records: Activity; phased budget; actual expenditure; planned progress; verified progress.
Identify overdue source reviews needed for project reporting.
What the selected record shows. Open days past due: 29 days. Follow up overdue case.
Next step. Follow up overdue case; confirm the missing condition evidence. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A reporting deadline does not establish data quality or permit release.
Open age = assessment date − received date. Days past due = max(0, assessment date − recorded due date) for open cases. Show documented critical conditions separately.
Example due dates are not legal service standards. Do not alter statutory deadlines by silently subtracting pauses, or infer severity from age alone.
Other required records: Report deadline; required dataset; submission status; review age; responsible owner.
Check interventions whose stated sites, purposes and delivery periods overlap.
What the selected record shows. Overlapping days: 61 days. Review possible overlap.
Next step. Review possible overlap. Prepare overlap review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
An overlap is a coordination flag, not proof of double counting or wrongdoing.
Compare the same permitted entity, purpose and qualifying unit. Intersect dated support intervals; overlapping support is a review flag, not proof of duplicate entitlement.
Other required records: Site ID; intervention footprint; component; schedule; beneficiary IDs; purpose.
Compare work-plan choices against commitments, resources and programme constraints.
What the selected record shows. There is not enough information to choose this option. Obtain the records and evidence about conditions listed below. The supplied budget less cost is 300,000 LKR.
Next step. Obtain the missing records before choosing. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A budget surplus does not establish deliverability or programme value.
Compare each alternative's stated benefit, adverse effects, domain evidence and mandatory constraints. Where cost and budget are supplied, budget balance = budget − option cost. A budget balance alone does not determine domain feasibility or select an option.
Other required records: Activities; costs; dependencies; outcomes; capacity; safeguards; funding ceiling.
Reconcile activity funding needs, commitments, receipts and expenditure.
What the selected record shows. Unfunded need: 850,000 LKR. Review unfunded need.
Next step. Review unfunded need. Prepare funding review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Unfunded need and undisbursed commitments are separate gaps.
Unfunded = need − commitments. Undisbursed = commitments − disbursements. Unspent = disbursements − eligible spending.
Keep commitments, cash receipts, expenditure and verified physical outputs separate. Negative balances flag overcommitment or reconciliation; no automatic accounting adjustment.
Other required records: Approved cost; confirmed commitments; disbursements; expenditure; currency; funding terms.
Check procurement task windows, resources and dependencies.
What the selected record shows. Planned duration: 3 days. Resolve overlapping resource bookings.
Next step. Resolve overlapping resource bookings. Prepare schedule review in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
The example does not establish a complete project critical path or authorise procurement.
Check start/end order, operating window, effort, predecessor completion and overlapping bookings for the same resource. A conflict is flagged; no optimal schedule is invented.
Other required records: Procurement package; lead time; milestones; dependencies; approvals; delivery windows.
Compare contract milestone dates and the evidence for outstanding deliverables.
What the selected record shows. Calendar date difference: 8 days.
A date difference does not determine liability, penalties or contractual acceptance.
Observed date minus planned date in calendar days. Missing actual dates are pending, not zero delay. Approved working-day rules require a defined calendar.
Other required records: Contract version; milestone dates; actual delivery; acceptance; conditions; contractor.
Check environmental and social case evidence for responsible referral.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this safeguards case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Next step. Obtain the missing evidence listed below. Prepare evidence request in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
A checklist does not certify safeguards or calculate a risk probability.
Check each required item and retain its reference. A documented item is not a scientific, legal or institutional approval.
Show the hazard, exposure and verified controls separately. No generic score, probability, diagnosis, site clearance or official warning is derived from a count.
Other required records: Activity scope; screening; affected people; safeguards; mitigations; reviewer; conditions.
Identify programme grievances whose response date has passed.
The prototype does not send an escalation or determine the grievance outcome.
Other required records: Case ID; confidential category; received date; due date; response; escalation owner.
Identify eligible households without confirmed access to project benefits.
What the selected record shows. 30 households are known to be uncovered; 5 have unknown coverage. 65% are confirmed covered.
Next step. Check the records behind the uncovered and unknown groups. Prepare coverage follow-up in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Coverage does not establish eligibility, vulnerability or informed consent.
100 × distinct covered eligible units / eligible frame. Known uncovered = frame − covered − unknown.
Count each eligible unit once for the selected service and period. Received messages, attendance, adoption and outcomes are separate measures.
Other required records: Eligible population frame; unique recipients; consented group attributes; location; benefit type.
Compare a proposed scope change with the retained baseline and constraints.
The example neither accepts a change nor alters the agreed scope.
Other required records: Baseline scope; proposed change; cost; schedule; benefits; consultations; constraints.
Identify missing evidence for mandatory pre-work conditions.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this decision conditions case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
A complete record does not grant an approval or operate a real work stoppage.
Evidence completeness alone cannot establish suitability, eligibility, safety, permission or method validity.
Other required records: Decision version; required approvals; conditions; completion evidence; appointed authority.
Check partner tasks for resource clashes and unmet predecessors.
A draft schedule does not assign work to a partner.
Other required records: Partner tasks; deliverables; due dates; dependencies; capacity; consultation responses.
Compare programme outcome changes and the evidence for attribution.
Verified published formula · Difference-in-differences arithmetic
What the selected record shows. Treatment change: 17; comparison change: 7; difference in changes: 10 percentage points. This comparison alone does not establish causation or benefit.
A descriptive difference does not establish a programme effect.
(Treatment after−before) − (comparison after−before), using the same outcome definition and periods.
The arithmetic alone does not establish causation. Design, parallel trends, confounding, attrition, uncertainty and adverse effects need appropriate evidence. This named fictional indicator illustrates the calculation. Design evidence, adverse effects and attribution remain separate; a difference in changes does not establish causation.
Other required records: Baseline indicators; follow-up; comparison; sampling; external factors; evaluation design.
World Bank · Impact Evaluation in Practice Second EditionInstitution publication · Chapter 7, table 7.2, printed page 140, PDF page 170
The formula is verified. Causal interpretation still requires a defensible study design, comparison and assumptions.
Compare the stated financial scenario cash flows.
Verified published formula · Discounted cash-flow NPV
What the selected record shows. At the supplied 8% annual discount assumption, the five-year cash flows and residual value give 109,847.353 LKR net present value after the initial investment. The figure compares cash flows under these assumptions.
Next step. Review the cash flows, discount assumptions and constraints. Prepare cash-flow comparison in the prototype creates a visible, downloadable draft. It is unassigned and not sent.
Present value alone does not approve an implementation or financing choice.
NPV = −initial investment + sum of year1…5 net cash flows discounted at the stated annual rate, including residual value once in year5.
Match currency, price year, real/nominal basis and cash-flow timing. The example rate and five-year horizon are assumptions, not institutional financing terms; no credit approval follows.
Other required records: Scenario costs; delays; benefits; residual risks; cash-flow dates; discount rate.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · Guidelines for defining financial economic environmental and social informationInstitution publication · Sections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, discounting and Net Present Value
The five-year horizon, discount rate and cash assumptions are local settings. Verification does not approve an investment or loan.
Identify handover assets missing maintenance, ownership or responsibility evidence.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this asset handover case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
A complete checklist does not transfer ownership or establish operational acceptance.
Other required records: Asset ID; acceptance; owner; maintenance plan; budget; training; handover conditions.
Compare further piloting, expansion and redesign choices using the available evidence.
A cost comparison does not establish readiness to scale.
Other required records: Verified outcomes; costs; context; adverse effects; evidence quality; transferability.
Identify missing source references and definitions in a report package.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this evidence catalogue case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Complete references do not verify the underlying findings.
Other required records: Evidence ID; source version; period; geography; license; reviewer; lineage.
Check outstanding financial, technical and safeguard obligations.
What the selected record shows. The required evidence is incomplete for this project closure case. The items below identify what must be obtained or reconciled.
Document completeness does not establish final programme acceptance.
Other required records: Closure checklist; contracts; finances; assets; unresolved cases; outcome evidence.
Check which existing source fields can supply the decision inputs.
Existing form reference: e6af681e07c8efdc
Your institution has its own document and image library. Use the same library for reports, photos and other evidence.
Open this screen for Project Management UnitSee the presentation example
Files added in the prototype stay in this browser. Public sharing is an access preview. Existing public reference links already work online.
Data structure keeps the existing source tree, records, charts and map. Manage structure adds a place to propose changes to definitions.
An entity type means a kind of thing or event, such as a reservoir or an inspection. Drafts stay in this browser. A demo approval does not change real definitions, data, chart links or sharing rights.
User management shows example profiles for each institution. People and Roles and access let you review the proposed account screens.
These are interface previews only. They create no account, send no email and change no access. Use example details in the preview. Institution verification does not grant a real permission.
We currently use public data and published reports where available. Please confirm whether your institution can provide data directly, so we can avoid retyping or reading figures from PDFs.
Do not enter passwords, access keys or private account details.
Use the Download answers button at the top of this page. Share the downloaded file or printed copy through your agreed review channel. Nothing is sent automatically.